Tim Ruffing <d...@real-or-random.org> writes:
> Thanks for installing the latexenc patch. :)
Thanks for raising this issue in the first place.
> Unless I'm mistaken, I think you misread my patch.
Yes, sorry, my bad. I misremembered what we talked about up-thread.
> Sorry for not explaining it in more detail. What this does is that it
> removes reftex- using-biblatex-p, effectively replacing it by "t". In
> other words, the detection is removed, and it is conservatively
> assumed that biblatex is used. As a result,
> reftex-locate-bibliography-files will always consider all
> \bibliography or \addbibresource macros. Removing the detection
> heuristic will eliminate all bugs in it. ;)
>
> The only drawback is potentially decreased performance for users that
> don't use biblatex. I haven't benchmarked this, but I really think the
> overhead, if any, should be entirely negligible on a contemporary
> machine. (Also consider that detection also has a runtime cost.)
TBH, I'm reluctant about changing code which served well for more than a
decade. And IIRC, we're talking about some corner cases. So my vote is
to leave this now as is. I'm afraid that someone will come back to us
and says: I use bibtex and have a .tex file like this:
\documentclass{article}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\begin{document}
Text
\bibliography{biblatex-bib1}
\bibliography{biblatex-bib2}
\end{document}
And now, RefTeX shows me also not usable entries from biblatex-bib2.bib.
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
