Sorry for the late reply.
> Thanks! I'd appreciate if you could test the files attached. Based
> on the above, I had to patch font-latex.el even more to deal with
> the '++' stuff; a new diff is attached. You also have a manyfoot.el
> at your service which parses your file(s) for \DeclareNewFootnote
> and declares all the macros/counter/fontification rules etc. Please
> let me know if it works as expected.
It works great, thanks!
> May we shouldn't fontify the final mandatory argument of the
> \footnote* macros?
I don't understand what you mean, please elaborate.
Regarding the not-colorization of footnotes: I assume this your code
```
(with-eval-after-load 'font-latex
(setq-default
font-latex-match-reference-keywords-local
(remove (assoc-string "footnote"
font-latex-match-reference-keywords-local)
font-latex-match-reference-keywords-local)))
```
should be put into the `.emacs` file, right? If so, it doesn't work.
Maybe this is related to AUCTeX using `bigfoot.el` and friends?
BTW, what I would really like to have is the argument of `\footnote`
in a pale colour, and the macros within the footnote argument in
bright colours as usual. No idea whether this is possible, though...
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
