On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 05:07:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After configuring, making and trying to test autoconf 2.58 (using the same > version of automake (1.9.2) as another project that required autoconf 2.58 > or greater...), I received the following testsuite.log file and a message > with a request to send it to this email.
Please use Autoconf 2.59 instead. It will not affect your test suite results, but it is definitely the better version. > 2. tools.at:92: 2. Syntax of the Perl scripts (tools.at:92): FAILED > (tools.at:104) This is fixed in CVS as of 2003-12-29. > 3. tools.at:118: testing ... > tools.at:126: autom4te --language=m4sugar script.4s -o script > tools.at:134: autom4te --language=m4sugar script.4s -o script > stderr: > script.4s:1: /bin/m4: Cannot open foo: No such file or directory > autom4te: /bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > tools.at:134: exit code was 0, expected 1 > 3. tools.at:118: 3. autom4te cache (tools.at:118): FAILED (tools.at:134) Weird. What is the output of `/bin/m4 --version'? > 24. base.at:29: testing ... > base.at:60: autoconf > --- /dev/null Thu Jul 14 20:46:02 2005 > +++ /home/tlvogl/apps/autoconf-2.58/tests/testsuite.dir/at-stderr Thu Jul > 14 14:48:39 2005 > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +autom4te: cannot lock autom4te.cache/requests with mode 2 (perhaps you are > running make -j on a lame NFS client?): Invalid argument > 24. base.at:29: 24. AC_REQUIRE: topological sort (base.at:29): FAILED > (base.at:60) This causes most of the test failures. Why does your Perl flock(file, LOCK_EX) return EINVAL on a file below the Autoconf build directory? Thanks for the report.
