> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >For example, emacs could send the shell something like "shopt
> > -u -o emacs; shopt -u -o vi". Then emacs could leave EMACS alone.
>
> Stuffing input to a subshell like that is in general not something you
> can do reliably.
Yeah, that's dicy, but you don't have to do it. Just invoke the shell
with the `--noediting' option.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tiswww.tis.case.edu/~chet/
