Hi,
so it seems I haven't talked Eric into backing out this improvement
;-)
So we should fix our test. Proposed patch attached; does anyone see
any problem in it?
Have a nice day,
Stepan
2006-10-24 Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tools/trace.at (autoconf --trace: user macros): Make the
test independent on what line number m4 reports for macro
calls spanning multiple lines. Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
Index: tests/tools.at
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/tests/tools.at,v
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -r1.92 tools.at
--- tests/tools.at 11 Sep 2006 16:42:57 -0000 1.92
+++ tests/tools.at 24 Oct 2006 19:24:59 -0000
@@ -139,12 +139,6 @@
TRACE1(foo, TRACE1(bar, baz))
TRACE1(foo, active, baz)
TRACE1(foo, [active], TRACE1(active, [active]))
-
-# With arguments, multiple lines.
-TRACE1(foo
-bar,
-bar
-foo)
]])
# Several --traces.
@@ -164,8 +158,6 @@
configure.ac:13:TRACE2:active
configure.ac:13:TRACE1:foo:active::ACTIVE
configure.ac:13:TRACE2:active::ACTIVE
-configure.ac:19:TRACE1:foo bar:bar foo
-configure.ac:19:TRACE2:bar foo
]])
# Several line requests.
@@ -185,10 +177,6 @@
[ACTIVE], [active], [].
[foo], [active], [].
-
-[foo
-bar], [bar
-foo], [].
]])
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@@ -201,8 +189,19 @@
[ACTIVE])===([baz]
[active]
[active])===([])===([ACTIVE]
-[bar
-foo]
+]])
+
+# Arguments spanning multiple lines.
+AT_DATA([configure.ac],
+[[m4_define([TRACE], [])
+TRACE(foo
+bar,
+bar
+foo)
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK_AUTOCONF([-t TRACE:'$%'], 0,
+[[foo bar:bar foo
]])
AT_CLEANUP
