Hi,
according to my experience, people who run "info autoconf" expect
to get the Autoconf manual, not "autoconf Invocation".
I hear someting like
``I tried "info autoconf", but it gave me an unusable man page''
And they feel trapped when I tell them to type "uu" or "t" or start
with "info Autoconf" (capital `a') instead.
I'd like to make their experience with the info documentation better,
possibly by the patch below.
What do you think?
2007-01-12 Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/autoconf.texi: Direntry for "autoconf Invocation" renamed.
Index: doc/autoconf.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/doc/autoconf.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.1125
diff -u -r1.1125 autoconf.texi
--- doc/autoconf.texi 8 Jan 2007 19:54:10 -0000 1.1125
+++ doc/autoconf.texi 12 Jan 2007 10:51:12 -0000
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
* autoscan: (autoconf)autoscan Invocation.
Semi-automatic @file{configure.ac} writing
* ifnames: (autoconf)ifnames Invocation. Listing conditionals in source.
-* autoconf: (autoconf)autoconf Invocation.
+* autoconf invocation: (autoconf)autoconf Invocation.
How to create configuration scripts
* autoreconf: (autoconf)autoreconf Invocation.
Remaking multiple @command{configure} scripts
