Thanks for the quick reply Noah and James.
Also, thanks for your work with GNU!!
Eric
PSoCDeveloper is a PIAP Technical Consulting, LLC website
Site administrator: Eric Blom
http://www.PSoCDeveloper.com/feedback
On May 19, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 05:44:37PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
On 5/19/07, Eric Blom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
configure: WARNING: dlfcn.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected
by the preprocessor!
configure: WARNING: dlfcn.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's
result
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING: ## Report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ##
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ##
There are two bugs here. The first is, as I understand things, that
the author of the package which you are trying to configure has
failed
to set up something that would normally make "Report this to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" actually say "Report this to
some-more-useful-mailing-list." I suspect that the fact that
autoconf allows package maintainers to fail to set the variable
is, in
fact, essentially a bug in autoconf.
Autoconf 2.57 generates configure scripts that always ask for a
report to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Autoconf 2.59 and later ask for a report to
the package
bug report address, if specified, or else to "the GNU foo
lists" (for example).
It will take time for installations of Autoconf 2.57 die out, and
even longer to
obsolete all package releases bootstrapped with Autoconf 2.57.
These reports
will trickle in for years to come.
