* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:23:03PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de> writes:
> >
> > Thinking about it, it's clear that [ ] should have been written as
> > @|:@ @:|@
>
> How so? C99 supports <: and :> as the digraphs for [ and ].
I wasn't being very serious.
> Any other votes for the preferred spelling?
I'm fine with what you suggest. Nits below.
> @@ -10904,6 +10912,14 @@ m4_quote(active2, active2)
> @result{}ACT, IVE,ACT, IVE
> m4_expand([active2, active2])
> @result{}ACT, IVE, ACT, IVE
> +m4_expand([case $foo in #(
> + [[!@@<:@@]]bar) blah ;;
How come this line doesn't end in #( ?
> + *@@:@}@@ baz ;;
> +esac])
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $foo in #(
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [![]) blah ;;
Likewise.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *) baz ;;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> @end example
> @end defmac
Cheers,
Ralf
