Hello,

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:38:08AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> | autoheader calls this "warning", but it does not create
> | config.h.in then.  Even worse, if config.h.in existed, it's not
> | updated.
> | The mistake was introduced by a change almost
> | 5 years old!  The attached diff documents it.
> |
> | Possible solutions:
> | - update the template anyway
[...]
> I'm okay with updating the template anyway; does the patch you attached do
> this, or is this something where a patch has not yet been written?  Are
> you able to tackle this?

I have not written any patch.  I hope I'll get to it soon and post a
patch as another followup.

My previous mail contained an attachment, named
autoheader-guilty.patch, documenting the spot where the problem was
introduced, extracted from the history as archived in git.

I apologize for the confusion.  I admit that sending a mail with one
attachment, named *.patch, which is _not_ a patch, was not nice.

> Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Well, was this fun?  ;-)

Cheers,
        Stepan


Reply via email to