Maybe it's worth a ping to the dash maintainers...
Yes...
Is that a "yes I'll do it"? I'm happy to otherwise, pointing them at
this thread, but I imagine it would have more effect from an autoconf
maintainer.
Which I am not, just a contributor. But yes, I can do that.
I hate to say "patches are welcome", but I have to. I'm too busy at the
moment, which is something I also hate to say because everybody is.
I am, as I said, happy to help. I would appreciate some guidance, in
the shape of knowing what the autoconf maintainers think is lacking in
terms of M4sh documentation. Otherwise, I'll just take what you wrote
in the last email and try to work it into a patch for autoconf.texi.
That would be great.
Paolo
