Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:46:19PM CET: > > Maybe I should document the diversion names of DEFAULTS and > INIT_PREPARE; I'm a bit undecided on that one. But I don't want to > document the values associated with named diversions, so that we are > free to change the underlying value at a later date (maybe > INIT_PREPARE will move to 350 if we add a new named diversion that > needs to be at 300); as long as you go through named interfaces rather > than raw numbers, then we can make such changes under the hood without > breaking compatibility with your configure.ac.
Hmm, is it somehow possible for the user to define a new diversion number between DEFAULTS and INIT_PREPARE by referring to these symbols only? If yes, is that something you'd want to allow the user to do? Cheers, Ralf
