Follow-up Comment #4, sr #111243 (group autoconf): [comment #3 comment #3:] > The "long long reliablity" test is not part of autoconf, so any bug reports > need to be sent to whoever maintains that test.
Apologies for the noise; my brief inspection of the code led me to believe
that it was part of autoconf.
> I cannot reproduce the problem with stdbool.h using Autoconf 2.72 (as shipped
> with Fedora 42), when building cifs-tools commit
> 5ba5b16a73e70b586355b591f9feefbe3c493bc2 (aka version 7.3).
Hm, that's interesting. And I'm assuming that you're using GCC 15 as well?
> The message "checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99" listed in the
> original bug report is not generated by Autoconf 2.72; it is generated by
> older versions of Autoconf. So it appears the original bug report is
> mistaken, in that the bug is about older Autoconf versions (which are indeed
> buggy in this area), not about Autoconf 2.72 (where the bugs are fixed).
I just checked and the build is indeed using Autoconf 2.72, so it wasn't a
mistake on my end.
I will perform a few more tests here and report back if I find something.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?111243>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
