On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:08, William Park wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 07:33:14PM -0500, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, William Park wrote:
> > >Let's see...
> > > a-{b{d,e}}-c
> > > a-{bd,be}-c
> > > a-bd-c a-be-c
> > >
> > >It looks okey, I think.
> >
> > Except that b{d,e} expands to 'bd be', not 'bd,be'.
>
> Hmm... no. Internally,
arguing for what goes on internally shouldnt have bearing on what the user
result is ... and in this case, the user result would be as Chris says imho
-mike
_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
