lexton wrote:
From what I read it is not good to use ls -la in the manner I use below. Could I run this by just using the find command with additional arguments? I still need to be able to print everything that the ls -la command gives me
GNU find has an -ls option IIRC, which produces output similar to ls -l. If that's not the case, you can always find ... -exec ls -ld {} \; or so.
J.
