On Saturday 25 July 2009, Linda Walsh wrote: > AFAIK, I'm still screwed if I want to create more than one > pipe for outputs -- either sending stderr to one pipe and stdout to > another, OR a way of even doing what "tee" does, but built into the > shell, so I could, using the building "tee", a file descriptor as an > output target.
IIUC, This can be accomplished with process substitution: myprogram 1> >(command1) 2> >(command2) 3> >(command3) etc.etc. where command1 gets what myprogram writes to fd 1, command2 gets what myprogram writes to fd 2, etc.etc. But maybe I'm not understanding correctly what you're looking for. -- D.
