On 5/5/16 6:02 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Piotr Grzybowski <narsil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok, so Dan wants this patch.
>
> Yes I think your bash patch is probably an improvement at least in
> this particular case.
>
>> Maybe you can comment on wether the patches are valid.
>
> The posix export and readonly don't produce locally scoped variables
> at all, so it's expected that e.g. `typeset -x` and `export` will
> differ.
This is a different topic entirely, since neither of the examples
we're considering take place within a function. Scoping isn't an
issue.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
