On 8/23/17 10:49 AM, dethrophes wrote:
> Well technically I don't *have* to accept the performance penalty.
>
> As I can just use the posix comform syntax, which is quicker.
Wait, which posix-conforming syntax? Because your original example, which
had five arguments to `test', is explicitly unspecified:
>4 arguments:
The results are unspecified.
unless you're on an XSI-conformant system.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
