On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > > Let's see if I can find some compromise language that will take care > of the general case. Since it's a compromise, no one will be > satisfied, of course.
Thanks -- any improvement would be good.
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
