Chet Ramey (<chet.ra...@case.edu>) wrote: > On 11/24/18 2:32 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > > >> But IMO locale collation should not be used for an explicit list. > > > > Collation order is used for each individual character in a bracket > > expression when compared against the string, as posix specifies. >
Yes, values resulting from a glob expansion should be compared with strcoll. How many characters should there be in a range like [0-0] ? Or to be more precise: in a [0] bracket expression? one? If I were you, I would file a bug report with Debian against wcscoll. > And I would be told that wcscoll is doing what the collation file 14651 is telling it to do. And, that in any case, that file has been updated in glib2.8 anyway. > It returns 0 (equal) for L"٠" and L"0" without setting errno. That's > clearly a problem with wcscoll (if the character isn't valid in the current > locale) or the locale definition. > Both characters collate to the same position as I have already explained. I don't follow you about what you mean with: *(if the character isn't valid in the current locale).*
