On 2021/03/23 21:41, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
On Mar 23, 2021, at 11:43 PM, Eli Schwartz <eschwa...@archlinux.org> wrote:
It's not clear to me, how you expect this to differ from the existing
behavior of "$@" or "${arr[@]}" which already expands to <nothing>
rather than an actual "" parameter.
The original message does recall the behavior of the earliest Bourne
shells [1][2], but that is surely not relevant here, given the use
of ((...)). Right? RIGHT???
----
Hmmm...Now that I try to show an example, I'm not getting
the same results. Grrr. Darn Heizenbugs.
*sigh*
