On Sun, Jun 6, 2021, at 12:35 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2021-06-05T23:29:58-0400, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > doc/oldbash.texi
> > 178:manual. Brian and Diane would like to thank Chet Ramey for his
> > 9138:# The alternative explanation is that his frequent use of the
>
> My "git grep" didn't turn this file up anyway. Maybe I'm on the wrong
> branch?
I'm on the "devel" branch.
> > That's three. Pretty tractable for anyone so inclined. (Didn't
> > look at source code comments or anything.)
>
> Thanks, Lawrence!
Sorry, you might want to redo your patch. It just occurred to me
that I made a predictable oversight.
% git grep --perl-regexp '\b(she|her|hers)\b' -- '*.texi'
doc/oldbash.texi:# If the user has her own init file, then use that
one, else use
doc/oldbash.texi:and the second draft. Without her help, this manual
would probably
lib/readline/doc/rltech.texi:possible-completions call. After that,
readline asks the user if she is sure
lib/readline/doc/rltech.texi:she wants to see them all. The default
value is 100. A negative value
(I believe doc/oldbash.texi is a legacy document that needn't be
bothered with.)
--
vq
