On 6/15/21 3:19 PM, Zachary Fields wrote:
Again, this can be reproduced with only Valgrind and Bash installed, by copy/pasting the following command:

Don't be so sure:

==34794== LEAK SUMMARY:
==34794==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34794==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34794==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34794==    still reachable: 20,847 bytes in 464 blocks
==34794==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks

on RHEL 7 with the current devel version and

==34900==
==34900== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==34900==

with bash-5.1.8.

==53602== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 264
==53602==    at 0x483C7F3: malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==53602==    by 0x198523: xmalloc (in /usr/bin/bash)
==53602==    by 0x19199E: set_default_locale (in /usr/bin/bash)
==53602==    by 0x136C8A: main (in /usr/bin/bash)

It depends on the libc implementation of setlocale(3).

This has come up a number of times before:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-07/msg00073.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2017-04/msg00063.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2017-06/msg00052.html

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

  • Memory leak ... Zachary Fields via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
    • Re: Mem... Chet Ramey
      • Re:... Zachary Fields via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
        • ... Chet Ramey
          • ... Zachary Fields via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
          • ... Mike Jonkmans

Reply via email to