On 12/11/23 9:41 AM, Albert Akchurin wrote:
Machine Type: x86_64-pc-linux-gnuBash Version: 5.2 Patch Level: 21
Description: `declare -f` wrongly displays the `coproc my_command` statement.
Thanks for the report. I agree that command printing should omit the coproc name if the command is a simple command. The documentation warns against using simple commands as coprocs, but the parser doesn't actually prohibit it, and adding the coproc name there introduces ambiguity. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature