On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:03 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
> On 6/7/25 4:42 PM, Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again > SHell > wrote: > > > I appreciate the effort to make the test run more efficiently and faster, > > and that's probably a good idea, but I think there still needs to be a > way > > out. I didn't express just how huge our ARG_MAX is. It's 2^62 or 4.6 > > exabytes. I don't think there's any way to reasonably expect that this > test > > will complete with that environment, so I still need a way of skipping > the > > test. > > So `getconf ARG_MAX' returns 4611686018427387904? I can do something > with that. > That's correct
