Akim Demaille wrote: > Wouldn't > > (void) &from_in_fd; > > do the trick? Taking the address of a variable should ensure it is > not in a register.
This doesn't work any more in gcc-4.0. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21160 The gcc people recommend to use 'volatile' instead; this is consistent with ISO C 7.13.2.1.(3). Bruno
