Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This was reported in > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00050.html > and > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00037.html > > and fixed in > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00030.html
That last message talks about the fix, but its patch is about something else entirely (which confused me at the time, and now I see it's confusing you too.... :-). Here's where the fix actually is: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00050.html
