In a message dated 12/21/2005 3:11:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote: > >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> - we desire that in all the skeletons no $n is ever freed from an > >> "active" rule, even if we leave it using YYACCEPT, YYERROR, or > >> YYABORT. > > > Yes, that sounds right. > > Well, AFAICS that's already the behavior in glr.c, isn't it? > Otherwise I missed the bit of code that is wrong. As I recall, it was just YYABORT and YYACCEPT in yacc.c that was a problem. When I looked at the time, glr.c seemed fine. Joel _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison Hello Folks: I'd like to get off this E-mail list but don't know how to do so. Can any of you give me a hand? cheers
