Paul Eggert wrote: >>>> +if test -a bootstrap ; then >>> This doesn't look right; "test -a" is not portable. >> Hm, what's not portable about that? > > The better question is what _is_ portable about it? I've never seen > "test -a" used before. It's not specified by POSIX > <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/test.html>
Okay, maybe -f instead? That's in the list. Sebastian
