On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > I'm using the stock gcc on an up-to-date Fedora 11 system: > > gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC)
I'm building that and will try it soon. > > Because Sbitset__index is a size_t, wouldn't the following patch be > > better? > I didn't know (and didn't dig) if it could be negative, > presumed that the author chose %d for a good reason, Nope, I was the author, and I was being sloppy. :) > I'm glad there was a better say. Thanks again for the report. I pushed that patch to master and branch-2.5.
