On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, ihusar wrote: > The problem, at kleast what seems to me strange, is here:
> Stack 0 Entering state 13 <<-------------------------------------we are in > state 13 > Next token is token T_DEC_CONST () > Splitting off stack 1 from 0. > Reduced stack 1 by rule #131; action deferred. Now in state 56. > <----------- here we get to states 56 and 54 > Stack 1 Entering state 56 > Next token is token T_DEC_CONST () > Reduced stack 0 by rule #120; action deferred. Now in state 54. > <----------- > > > However, there is no transition from state 13 to state 56 or 54: > 120 ynt_aut_opc_badr2AR_C_0_439__0: YT_0_ . > 131 ynt_aut_opc_dadr2AR_ACC_0_409__0: YT_0_ . One of these reductions is being performed, so state 13 is popped from the stack before the transition to state 56 or state 54.
