On 10/01/2010 03:22 PM, Paul Hilfinger wrote: > I am curious to know whether the > syntax (accepted by bison) > > foo: bar > ; | baz > ; | thud > ;;; > > is actually intentional.
"Intentional"? I don't know. But but traditional yacc supports it, and Bison is compatible. I suppose you could write Steve Johnson and ask him whether he really meant it when he wrote yacc lo these many years ago. His contact info is at <http://www.yaccman.com/>.
