Le 31 janv. 2012 à 09:57, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Akim Demaille wrote: >> Installed in branch-2.5. >> >> Is there some standard in the gnulib universe on the names to >> give to the various branches? In Bison, master is the next major >> release, and we use branch-X.Y for the maintenance branches, but >> some version independent naming scheme would be fine. > > You might like to follow git.git's example. They use branches named > after their function, rather than ones named after (imho)less-meaningful > numbers. > > That seems more scalable in the long run: > > maint > master > next > pu > todo > > Otherwise, eventually you'll end up with many many branches, > all but a few of which are inactive.
Thanks! Using these names, I found the gitworkflows man page! (http://schacon.github.com/git/gitworkflows.html) That does help understand what "pu" can mean (exercise left to the reader :)
