Le 8 juin 2012 à 21:59, [email protected] a écrit : >>>> Looking my test log and using -Os, I saw code does not what >>>> comment >>>> say in -Os case. >>> >>> I remove -O2 because I failed to find a means to silence >>> GCC warnings in that case. So it is really a known >>> *deficiency* to remove these flags, and the future >>> is to keep them. So, unless it does change how the way >>> the test suite behaves, I'd rather not do that. >>> > Now I understand better. > I need to apply my patch to fix tests 173 and 301 failures because both > produced .c code emitting various 'may be used uninitialized in this > function' warnings when -Os is not removed.
OK, I will install that change then, thanks!
