> Le 27 févr. 2015 à 18:01, Askar Safin <safinas...@mail.ru> a écrit : > > Hi.
Hi Askar, > Please add variant support to GLR C++ parser. Reason is following: > * Having C++ parser is cool. It allows us to have non-trivial C++ objects as > semantic values Yes, I agree. > * But then (if we use non-trivial objects as semantic values) we need variant Yes, I agree. > * And (as docs say) nearly any modern programming language needs GLR parser > and not LARL1 Well, I kinda disagree about this, but I do agree GLR is a must-have. > If you don't plan to add this support at near future, then, please, put big > fat warning to docs that GLR + C++ + variant is not supported at the > beginning of C++ section. If I knew this earlier I probably would not convert > my C parser to C++ parser. Please, CC me if you want to answer I'm sorry you were painted in the corner :( Valentin has been working on a proper implementation of GLR for C++ with variants, but it's unfinished work. I expect he'll be back on this during this year. Meanwhile, you _might_ want to try this modified version of version of Bison that does provide this (GLR + Variants + C++), but it's unsafe, badly written. It happens to work in some cases... *Do not* use it for production code. https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~akim/download/bison-3.0.4.19-fbaf.tar.xz
