Akim Demaille wrote: > > BTW, when checking this, I noticed there's a "void move" function > > declared (actually 3 of them for different classes) in the skeletons > > which I thought were involved here, but there doesn't seem to be any > > definition of them. So these declarations may be remnants, and you > > might want to remove them, Akim. > > These functions are not C++ standard, they participate in Bison's effort to > have some form of move semantics in C98.
I see now. I had searched for the definitions by grepping for "void[[:space:]]*move", but it didn't find them because they're indented like void move () I know that's FSF coding style, but I was reminded again why I don't like it ... ;) Regards, Frank