Yes, from the Fedora repo.. However, now that I look I notice something interesting as far as options for F7 folks like myself:
# yum search cfengine|grep fc7 cfengine.x86_64 2.2.1-1.fc7 updates cfengine.x86_64 2.1.22-3.fc7 fedora cfengine.x86_64 2.2.1-1.fc7 installed Looks like I can probably roll back to 2.1.22-3 Thanks.. A patch would still be great. I'll let you know how this works out. On 6/20/07 1:26 PM, "Jeff Sheltren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > >> HostRange statements seem to be totally broken in my RPM'd >> (cfengine-2.2.1-1.fc7) >> >> bizauth = ( HostRange(bizauth,001-100) ) >> >> Does not work. >> >> I first ran across this with hostnames like f7dev001, but then >> noticed a bug >> report mentioning a problem with hostnames like this, that is to say >> hostnames that have a numeral in the 'base'. >> >> bizauth001/bizauth00x do not have a numeral in the base portion, >> and I can't >> get this to class out these machines properly. >> >> Will I really have to wait until December if I want to see this >> fixed in an >> RPM? I suppose if a patch were available I could reroll my own >> package... >> >> I really, really, like Cfengine. But the way that HostRange seems >> to break >> in every other version really puts a damper on 1000+ node networks. >> >> Also, should I be testing this from a source compile before filing >> a bug? >> >> > > Hi Brian, are you using the RPM from Fedora or some other repo? If > it is the Fedora RPM, I'll be glad to include a patch in it once one > is available. > > -Jeff _______________________________________________ Bug-cfengine mailing list [email protected] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
