Here is Eric's revisal of package checking for Portage. I don't know if you want to consider these "in motion" for later patching, but since we are all playing with trunk and nobody is using in production (except for point-case-testing on our part) right? it might be better to get these applied so that it's easy for Eric to do more testing. YMMV.
Note: doesn't include changes to do.c because I don't believe they are necessary and it would appear that portage atoms will work if specified. Eric will likely clue-by-four me shortly with verbose output proving otherwise ... ;-) Note: this patch does allow a case for removing the packages, but without PortagePackageList implemented it will fail. I'm sure that as soon as the Check command and syntax are ironed out, he'll supply one (one would seem to derive from the other very easily) -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 _______________________________________________ Bug-cfengine mailing list [email protected] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
