So can we fix configure/etc to say this? On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Mark Burgess wrote: > I attempted to move on and demand 4.4 or above, but folks rebelled > and asked for continued support of older versions, so they are > everything remains in practice ok for older versions. Still I > recommend upgrading to avoid format incompatibilities later. > > Jo Rhett wrote: >> So now that you're back in town, can we get a verdict on this? >> >> (frankly I'm all for 4.4+ required, but either way we should make >> all the docs/code line up) >> >> On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Mark Burgess wrote: >>> I forget the precise history now. Two changes have occurred in the >>> library: in internal change and an API change. The latter was 4.4 I >>> think. I forget the former. I think it's safest to assume 4.4 is >>> needed, but I would have to go back through the records to figure >>> out >>> what happened the first time around. I think it was prior to svn >>> >>> M >>> >>> Jo Rhett wrote: >>>> I'm asking because configure claims only 4.4 or newer is >>>> supported, but >>>> >>>> 1. Actually checks for older versions >>>> >>>> 2. Revision 402 added support for pre-4.3 back into the code. >>>> >>>> So... what's the story. 4.4+ or not? >>>> >> > > >
-- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness _______________________________________________ Bug-cfengine mailing list [email protected] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
