Hi, please see my comments below... On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:11 PM, SiliconSlick wrote:
Hmm, maybe greylisting on the cfengine.org mail server? I'll leave that to Mark.Howdy again,I tried to send a patch to this list in February but it bounced due to taking too long to get to the mailhost. Not sure what's up with that. In any case, I had posted a fix to the SourceForge and I'm faily certain Mark got CC's, so I didn't sweat it.
However, since this is still broken, I'll try again. Here, in short, is the problem.
Wow, I would hate to see the long version! ;)
Negated installable classes are treated differently than other classes depending upon the actionsequence being processed.
[...]
I'll try to look into this report soon and let you know if I can reproduce your results. Thanks for the test case, that should help speed things along.1) explain to me what I'm not understanding and why the current behavior is not a bug/incorrect
[...]
It's a bit frustrating at this point that I'm either not getting it or I'm not convincing others of the, not inconsequential, problem.[*] Thanks, jack/Slick [*] I expect such from Redhat[**] but thought I'd have better luck here [**] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146291 posted (along with a fix), more than 3 years ago... still broken
I'm not sure what your feelings about RedHat in general have to do with this. Also, the bug report you link to is for system-config- network on RHEL-5 -- a quick glance at the comments doesn't reveal anything about cfengine; are you sure this is the correct bug?
-Jeff
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-cfengine mailing list [email protected] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
