I was wondering.. is this working as designed?
This means "inform=false" never does anything for processes match messages. Otherwise, cferror could be replaced by cfinform. grep -A 1 processes.*matched process.csnprintf(OUTPUT,CF_BUFSIZE*2,"%d processes matched %s (should be %d)\n",matches,pp->expr,pp->matches);
CfLog(cferror,OUTPUT,"");
--
snprintf(OUTPUT,CF_BUFSIZE*2,"%d processes matched %s (should
be >=%d)\n",matches,pp->expr,pp->matches);
CfLog(cferror,OUTPUT,"");
--
snprintf(OUTPUT,CF_BUFSIZE*2,"%d processes matched %s (should
be <=%d)\n",matches,pp->expr,pp->matches);
CfLog(cferror,OUTPUT,"");
--
R. Bastiaans, B.ICT :: Systems Programmer, HPC&V
SARA :: Computing and Networking Services
Kruislaan 402 PO Box 94613
1098 SM Amsterdam NL 1090 GP Amsterdam NL
P.+31 (0)20 592 3000 F.+31 (0)20 668 3167
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-cfengine mailing list [email protected] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
