This sounds good too! I know we had in the past a few people using bcc,
which is where the Makefile for Borland originally came from, but they
had not submitted updates in recent times. I do think supporting many
different compilers (beyond gcc) is very useful as a matter of principle
as each is able to identify a different set of problems and the result
is better quality code. Hmm...I guess that means I will need to add
Borland support and Makefiles to some of the other cc libraries as well...
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
Hi All,
Borland "Makefile.bcc" is out of date regarding
added and deleted files. The HEAD revision won't
compile with Borland C++ Builder 6.0 as is. I
presume the project is committed to some level
of Borland compiler support.
I've resolved the issues for my Borland compiler
but before proposing patches, I'd like to hear
what prior Borland compiler commitments must be
accommodated.
Best regards,
Conrad Pino
_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
Bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:GNU Telephony
adr:;;;;;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gnutelephony.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
Bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
