Having thought about it, you are right, they should be
"PersistException". This is most consistent with other parts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really doesn't matter to me which way it goes, and I'd be willing to
provide patches so that all the exceptions from the Engine class are
consistent.
How do you want it? Make them all ost::PersistException?
Just let me know, and I'll do the editing from the last release sources and
patch file providing.
Erik.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Sugar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 4:04 PM
To: Ohrnberger, Erik
Cc: bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
Subject: Re: C++ exceptions in persistent streams (patch!)
Originally persist had a completely different exception
system of it's
own at a time that Common C++ did not have a standardized exception
model, as the code has separate origin. I you are correct that it
should be consolidated for consistency. This was probably overlooked
when that was initially done.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
( . . snip . . )
_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
Bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:GNU Telephony
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+1 201 215 2609
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gnutelephony.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
Bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
