> On 8/31/25 18:58, yubiao hu wrote: >> Yes, this bug was identified via static code analysis. The initial >> finding that core dump would occur in `cell = xstrdup (mount_point);` >> when mount_point is NULL. > > It appears that the static analysis is reporting a false positive. Which > static analyzer are you using? Or are you doing this by hand? > > Do you get a false positive if you install the patch I sent you earlier? > You can find that patch again here: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=79336#8
The analysis was conducted using our internally-developed static analysis tool. My apologies, but I am unable to share the tool itself or its usage methodology. I have tested the patch, and it can pacify my static analyzer.
