[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The man and info pages don't explicitly mention that -T wipes out any > meaning of -l: > > $ yes|sed 500q|pr -l 44 -T|wc -l > 500 > $ yes|sed 500q|pr -l 44 |wc -l > 660 > $ yes|sed 500q|pr |wc -l > 594 > > Either document or fix it, please.
Thanks for mentioning that. It looks pretty clear that -T and -l are contradictory. It would make sense to have the documentation say that -T overrides any use of -l. Would you like to send such a change? > P.S. does anybody see these mails I send to bug-coreutils? Yes, of course :-) Why do you ask? _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
