Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> Anyway, it's still possible that 'uniq' has a bug, or perhaps
|> 'strcoll', depending on your further investigation.
It _is_ a bug in coreutils, not in strcoll:
- AC_CHECK_FUNCS(strcoll) is missing,
- the fallback implementation of memcoll using memcmp does not clear
errno.
Andreas.
2003-07-18 Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* memcoll.c (memcoll) [!HAVE_STRCOLL]: Clear errno.
--- coreutils-5.0.1/lib/memcoll.c.~1~ 2003-06-06 22:11:58.000000000 +0200
+++ coreutils-5.0.1/lib/memcoll.c 2003-07-18 11:58:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ memcoll (char *s1, size_t s1len, char *s
diff = memcmp (s1, s2, s1len < s2len ? s1len : s2len);
if (! diff)
diff = s1len < s2len ? -1 : s1len != s2len;
+ errno = 0;
#endif
2003-07-18 Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* jm-macros.m4 (jm_MACROS): Check for strcoll.
--- coreutils-5.0.1/m4/jm-macros.m4.~1~ 2003-07-12 20:46:46.000000000 +0200
+++ coreutils-5.0.1/m4/jm-macros.m4 2003-07-18 11:55:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([jm_MACROS],
realpath \
sethostname \
strchr \
+ strcoll \
strerror \
strrchr \
sysctl \
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N�rnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
