Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What problem arises in coreutils if we don't detect/work-around > that difference?
For example, 'touch -r A B', 'cp -p A B', etc. could set B's timestamp to be in the future; this could give 'make' conniptions. > I think that the bug in glibc won't end up lasting long > enough to make it onto a significant number of systems. > And for those users who are progressive (or maybe reckless :-) enough > that they get a losing glibc, I think it's reasonable to expect > them to upgrade pretty quickly to a version with the fix. OK, let's assume this for now. (Yay! It's less work.) _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
