Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > seq -w 0 -11 returns >> > 000 >> > -01 >> > ... >> > -11 > > Thanks, but isn't there another bug here? The default increment is 1, > which means that seq 0 -11 should output nothing at all. > > The current seq code automatically defaults the increment to be -1 if > the lower bound is less than the upper bound. This sounds wrong to > me. If I issue the command 'seq 0', I expect to get zero lines of > output, not two. The increment should default to 1, as the > documentation says. > > Here's a proposed patch. > > 2003-09-04 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * src/seq.c (step): Default to 1. > (print_numbers): Allow the output to be empty. > (main): The default step is 1, even if LAST < FIRST; > as per documentation. > * tests/seq/basic (onearg-2): Output should be empty.
Thank you! I've applied that. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
