Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Though the seq info page shows workarounds, it still wouldn't hurt if > somebody implemented seq -f %x, %o. Not me though.
IMHO, it's not worth the disruption to the code. The current implementation represents each number as a `double'. Since the formats you suggest are not appropriate for floating point types, using them would mean adding separate code to handle the case in which all numbers to be printed are integral and representable as an integral type. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
