Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) writes: >> I think it ought to be possible for the user building coreutils to say >> what version of conformance they want - say, with a ./configure >> argument - and this should override the unistd.h definition. > > That might be reasonable. The coreutils maintainer should have the > final say about this, though. He's probably tired of the whole > subject, though, so I suspect he won't make this change unless someone > proposes a nice patch to do it.
That's accurate. Thanks for writing so much on this thread. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
