Le Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:27:45 +0100, Jim Meyering disait : > Thank you for the patch. > > Have you read the GNU Coding Standards document?
No, not yet, but this mistake will soon be patched :) > Run `info standards' on a Linux system. There are > some minor syntactic problems below. Most would be eliminated > if you used GNU indent output as a model. If you use emacs, > using cc-mode helps for indentation. A strange thing is that my `info' version does not understand any standards ... anyway I found this documentation on the gnu web site here : http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html Now I 'only' have to learn a bit more ... I would like to thank you for the comments you made, showing me where I was wrong. I promise to make a special effort to code and review next patchs. By the Way, I sent a patch for `du', I saw there is some mistakes in it that you already told me ... and I was wondering which option sould be used to display null terminated file names in `du' : Dennis Smit proposed to add options to du and wc in order to read file names from a file in a zero separated way. The option proposed was -0 and --null but if the `du' program has to display results in the same way, which option should be used (to avoid confusing people) ? > This change is large enough that you'll have to send > a copyright assignment to the FSF. Here are the instructions: I didn't knew this ... well the first step is done. -- web site : http://olivier.delhomme.free.fr/ gpg public key : http://olivier.delhomme.free.fr/delhomme.gpg _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
